LAYER OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA) CHECKLIST

Created by ChecklistGuro (https://checklistguro.com)

--- PROCESS HAZARD IDENTIFICATION ---
[ ] Describe the Manufacturing Process Being Analyzed
[ ] Identify potential hazards associated with each step of the process.
[ ] Which hazard types are present? (Select all that apply) (Mechanical, Electrical, Chemical, Thermal, Ergonomic, Process Safety, Other (Specify))
[ ] For each identified hazard, describe the potential consequences if it occurs.
[ ] Estimated Number of Employees Potentially Affected by Each Hazard
[ ] Describe any existing documentation related to these hazards (e.g., SDS, process procedures)
[ ] Upload Process Flow Diagram (PFD)

--- INITIAL RISK ASSESSMENT (WITHOUT LAYERS OF PROTECTION) ---
[ ] Describe the manufacturing process being assessed.
[ ] Estimated Frequency of Occurrence (per year)
[ ] Severity Classification (e.g., Catastrophic, Critical, Moderate, Minor) (Catastrophic, Critical, Moderate, Minor)
[ ] Describe the potential consequences of the hazard if it were to occur.
[ ] Estimated Number of Personnel Potentially Affected
[ ] Environmental Impact Classification (e.g., High, Medium, Low) (High, Medium, Low)
[ ] Justification for Severity and Frequency Assignments

--- EXISTING LAYERS OF PROTECTION (LOLS) ---
[ ] Describe the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the process.
[ ] Which of the following mechanical safeguards are in place? (Select all that apply) (Guards, Interlocks, Light Curtains, Presence Sensing Devices, None)
[ ] What is the frequency of preventative maintenance for critical equipment (e.g., machine, conveyor)? (Days)
[ ] What type of personal protective equipment (PPE) is required for this process? (Safety Glasses, Hearing Protection, Gloves, Respirator, Full Body Suit, None)
[ ] Last review date of the process safety information (PSI).
[ ] Upload a copy of the relevant training records for personnel involved in this process.

--- LOL EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT ---
[ ] Frequency of LOL Testing/Inspection
[ ] LOL Verification Method (Regular Inspection, Periodic Testing, Operational Review, Auditing, Management of Change)
[ ] Summary of Previous LOL Performance/Failures
[ ] Is the LOL Fully Operational? (Yes, No)
[ ] Last LOL Maintenance Date (YYYY-MM-DD)
[ ] Which supporting documentation is available for this LOL? (Operating Procedures, Maintenance Records, Training Records, Design Specifications, Inspection Reports)
[ ] Describe any known limitations of this LOL.

--- POTENTIAL FAILURES OF LOLS ---
[ ] Describe potential human error scenarios that could lead to LOL failure.
[ ] Which of the following factors could contribute to LOL failure due to inadequate training? (Insufficient Initial Training, Lack of Refresher Training, Training not specific to the LOL, Inadequate competency assessment, Poor training documentation)
[ ] What is the estimated frequency (per year) of scheduled maintenance for this LOL?
[ ] When was the last time a complete audit/review of this LOL was conducted?
[ ] Describe any historical incidents or near misses where this LOL failed or nearly failed. (Include details of root cause and corrective actions)
[ ] What is the primary reason for LOL failure in similar processes or equipment? (Mechanical Failure, Electrical Fault, Procedural Deviation, Human Error, Design Flaw, Environmental Factors)
[ ] Describe how environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, vibration) could degrade the LOLâ€™s effectiveness.
[ ] Upload any relevant maintenance logs, inspection reports, or failure analyses for this LOL.

--- RISK REDUCTION WITH EXISTING LOLS ---
[ ] Is the LOL regularly inspected and maintained? (Yes, No, Not Applicable)
[ ] Frequency of LOL inspection (e.g., days, weeks, months)
[ ] Describe the process for verifying LOL effectiveness (e.g., testing, audits, reviews)
[ ] Has the LOL performed as intended in the past? (Yes, No, Unknown)
[ ] If 'No' was selected above, describe past failure events and corrective actions taken.
[ ] Estimated reduction in consequence severity (as percentage)
[ ] Estimated reduction in frequency of occurrence (as percentage)
[ ] Is independent verification of the LOL effectiveness available? (Yes, No)

--- RISK EVALUATION AFTER EXISTING LOLS ---
[ ] Severity Rating (Pre-LOLs)
[ ] Likelihood Rating (Pre-LOLs)
[ ] Risk Score (Pre-LOLs)
[ ] Severity Reduction Factor (Due to LOLs)
[ ] Likelihood Reduction Factor (Due to LOLs)
[ ] Residual Severity Rating (Post-LOLs)
[ ] Residual Likelihood Rating (Post-LOLs)
[ ] Residual Risk Score (Post-LOLs)
[ ] Risk Level (Post-LOLs) (Acceptable, Tolerable, Significant, Intolerable)
[ ] Justification for Risk Level Assessment

--- IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL LAYERS OF PROTECTION (ALOPS) ---
[ ] Describe potential failure scenarios that existing LOLs cannot adequately address.
[ ] Which of the following ALOP types are being considered? (Procedural Controls, Mechanical Safeguards, Electrical Interlocks, Emergency Shutdown Systems, Redundancy, Containment Systems, Independent Verification, Training & Competency)
[ ] Estimated Cost of implementing the ALOP (in USD).
[ ] Target Implementation Date for the ALOP.
[ ] Which department/team will be responsible for ALOP implementation? (Engineering, Maintenance, Operations, Safety & Health, Other)
[ ] Briefly explain the rationale behind selecting this particular ALOP.
[ ] Attach supporting documentation (e.g., vendor quotes, design drawings).
[ ] Describe any potential limitations or secondary risks associated with the proposed ALOP.

--- PROPOSED ALOP IMPLEMENTATION ---
[ ] Detailed Description of Proposed ALOP
[ ] Estimated Cost of Implementation (USD)
[ ] Target Implementation Start Date
[ ] Target Implementation Completion Date
[ ] Responsible Department for Implementation (Engineering, Maintenance, Operations, Safety, Procurement)
[ ] Required Resources (Select all that apply) (Personnel, Equipment, Software, Budget, Training)
[ ] Supporting Documentation (e.g., vendor quotes, design drawings)
[ ] Potential Challenges & Mitigation Strategies

--- ALOP EFFECTIVENESS ASSESSMENT ---
[ ] Has the ALOP been subject to independent review? (Yes, No, Not Applicable)
[ ] Estimated Reduction in Likelihood (Percentage)
[ ] Estimated Reduction in Consequence (Scale 1-5)
[ ] Justification for Estimated Reduction
[ ] What verification methods were used to assess ALOP effectiveness? (Review of Design Documentation, HAZOP Study, Simulated Testing, Operational Testing, Past Performance Data, Other (Specify in LONG_TEXT))
[ ] Specify 'Other' verification method (if selected)
[ ] Date of Last Verification/Testing
[ ] Upload Verification Documentation (e.g., test reports)

--- RISK EVALUATION WITH PROPOSED ALOPS ---
[ ] Estimated Reduction in Likelihood (%), after implementing ALOPs
[ ] Estimated Reduction in Consequence Severity (Scale: 1-5, 1=Negligible, 5=Catastrophic)
[ ] Overall Risk Level After ALOP Implementation (Compared to 'Risk Evaluation After Existing LOLs') (Higher, Same, Lower, Acceptable)
[ ] Justification for the Assigned Risk Level
[ ] Does the calculated risk level meet the pre-defined acceptance criteria? (Yes, No)
[ ] If 'No' to acceptance criteria, describe necessary actions or alternative strategies
[ ] Date of Next Review of Risk Level and ALOP Effectiveness

--- DOCUMENTATION AND REVIEW ---
[ ] LOPA Completion Date
[ ] LOPA Reviewer Name
[ ] Review Frequency (in months)
[ ] Summary of Key Findings & Recommendations
[ ] Supporting Documentation (e.g., P&IDs, Procedures)
[ ] Areas Requiring Follow-Up Actions (Procedure Updates, Training Needs, Equipment Modifications, Management of Change, None)
[ ] Notes from Review Meeting (including action items and assigned responsibility)
[ ] Date of Next Scheduled Review

--- END OF TEMPLATE ---
Transform this text into a digital, automated, and trackable mobile app!
Visit: https://checklistguro.com/templates/manufacturing/layer-of-protection-analysis-lopa-checklist
(Click "Install Template" to launch your digital inspection tool immediately)